Symposium - La fin!
I'm sooooooo fucking sore and thirsty right now. We just spent a good 12 hrs just standing and talking (8:30am to 8:30pm...) But I think our fourth year design project symposium went well. There were tons of cool projects - and I think CTV interviewed Nelson's group!
Heh, anyway, I thought of uncertainty principle like an hour after I wrote the damn thing (and it took me like an hour or so to write the last entry since I kept on writing stuff and erasing since I ended up not wanting some of the stuff in public... watching tv also doesn't help either :D) But yeah, I totally forgot about the name Heisenberg, so good call on that one XDDDDDDDDD (btw, XDDDDD = cross eyed + many big tongues/smiles... i've really only seen fobs use it.... but it appears to be the happier you are, the more DDDDDDDDDDD's u add, heh)
Thanks, and I would probably enjoy reading it, but right now, I'm so busy, it's ridiculous. I just finished symposium and my weekend is essentially full again... !@#%#@$@#!@#@ Grad apps, biomed assignment, researching night vision systems, photonics homework, and helping out with my prof in setting up some crap... ugh.... (he comes to my booth in the symposium and says like "we should have a meeting - can you come in on friday morning?" that kind of ruined my nice 3 day weekend that starts thurs after lunch...) But anyway, yeah, sometimes on the way home, Chris would bring up these quantum mech stuff and we'd talk about it - but unfortunately, i dunno enough to have a meaningful conversation. he was talking about theories like what if the universe is not going "forward" or expanding, but rather going backwards, just that to us, it appears as if we're going forward. oh yeah, i obtained da vinci code, still have to read it... argh^2!!!! all in all, I guess my last entry should've stated somewhere that I believe true and untrue science are not all that unlike, and I was trying to draw parallels between the two, hence the approximation in econ via distribution graphs and the "ideal physics world" for science experiments...
Finally, computers making a weird noise is never good - you should just give your system to me :D Hrmm what else... oh yeah, how can I forget - DS9 RULES, and if you don't agree - let's agree to disagree... and agree that you have poor taste in shows XDDDD But then again, I'm starting to get hooked on Buffy (no, not the girl - the show!)
Heh, anyway, I thought of uncertainty principle like an hour after I wrote the damn thing (and it took me like an hour or so to write the last entry since I kept on writing stuff and erasing since I ended up not wanting some of the stuff in public... watching tv also doesn't help either :D) But yeah, I totally forgot about the name Heisenberg, so good call on that one XDDDDDDDDD (btw, XDDDDD = cross eyed + many big tongues/smiles... i've really only seen fobs use it.... but it appears to be the happier you are, the more DDDDDDDDDDD's u add, heh)
Thanks, and I would probably enjoy reading it, but right now, I'm so busy, it's ridiculous. I just finished symposium and my weekend is essentially full again... !@#%#@$@#!@#@ Grad apps, biomed assignment, researching night vision systems, photonics homework, and helping out with my prof in setting up some crap... ugh.... (he comes to my booth in the symposium and says like "we should have a meeting - can you come in on friday morning?" that kind of ruined my nice 3 day weekend that starts thurs after lunch...) But anyway, yeah, sometimes on the way home, Chris would bring up these quantum mech stuff and we'd talk about it - but unfortunately, i dunno enough to have a meaningful conversation. he was talking about theories like what if the universe is not going "forward" or expanding, but rather going backwards, just that to us, it appears as if we're going forward. oh yeah, i obtained da vinci code, still have to read it... argh^2!!!! all in all, I guess my last entry should've stated somewhere that I believe true and untrue science are not all that unlike, and I was trying to draw parallels between the two, hence the approximation in econ via distribution graphs and the "ideal physics world" for science experiments...
Finally, computers making a weird noise is never good - you should just give your system to me :D Hrmm what else... oh yeah, how can I forget - DS9 RULES, and if you don't agree - let's agree to disagree... and agree that you have poor taste in shows XDDDD But then again, I'm starting to get hooked on Buffy (no, not the girl - the show!)
posted by whoami at 10:22 PM
2 Comments:
Sigh...fine, we agree to disagree. However, your interest in Buffy strengthens my view of your *questionable* taste in shows, although I must admit that the screenwriters showed flashes of brilliance during its peak. And perhaps you should be prepared when hot chicks drop by your house; I hope you were fully dressed. Ahahahahahahaha! :p
Well, it took me a while to find my underwear... But I didn't make them wait that long :P Ha ha, j/k... but wait, how would you know what Buffy was like during its peak? You closet Buffy fan...
Post a Comment
<< Home